Vibe coding and its implications

The risks associated with vibe coding

Unmanaged vibe coding amplifies existing open source security and supply chain risks, such as unknown provenance, vulnerable or malicious dependencies, leaked secrets, and lack of accountability. It also introduces AI-specific threats like hallucinations, inconsistent outputs and logical inconsistencies. Without rigorous code review, these risks propagate across the software development lifecycle (SDLC), expanding the attack surface in unforeseen ways, as automated generation can embed subtle vulnerabilities, bypass traditional security controls, and create opaque logic paths that are difficult to audit or validate, ultimately eroding trust in the integrity and reliability of the software.

Implications for developers and application security

Developer roles are shifting from writing code to orchestrating AI-driven workflows, with a focus on system integration, architecture, and validation of AI outputs. The growing reliance on AI for code generation, often by individuals without formal development training, risks eroding problem-solving skills and results in more brittle codebases. Meanwhile, application security professionals are seeing their responsibilities expand to include prompt and policy design, model governance, and AI-specific security controls to ensure that rapid adoption does not compromise compliance or resilience.

Organizations are adopting AI tools faster than they can develop policies and controls for them, leading to a growing governance gap. Many companies have not yet identified an approved list of tools or defined formal review processes for AI-generated code. There is also a clear need for new standards and audits around AI code provenance and agent permissions. And as agentic workflows increase the supply chain threat surface, tool calls, APIs, file systems, and CI/CD pipelines will all be impacted.

Key risks in vibe coding and agentic AI

Projects created by unchecked vibe coding can include several critical risks, particularly when produced by individuals new to AI tools or without formal development training. These risks include

• Prompt injection and data poisoning: Untrustworthy inputs can manipulate the AI model or agents to exfiltrate sensitive data, disable security checks, or fetch malicious dependencies.
• Tool and permission misuse: Agents with broad system access can quickly escalate privileges, leading to security breaches.
• Insecure code patterns: AI models may replicate known vulnerabilities or introduce novel ones, and larger or newer models do not necessarily improve security.
• Untraceable provenance: AI-generated code lacks commit history and authorship metadata, making it difficult to audit, license, or assign accountability.
• Model and plug-in supply chain attacks: Compromised models or plug-ins can corrupt AI outputs or runtime environments, and agentic workflows can amplify this risk through automated fetching and execution.
• “Shadow AI” and policy bypass: Unapproved AI assistants or agents can circumvent established controls, creating compliance gaps and increasing the attack surface for organizations.

Trends, challenges, and concerns

AI-first workflows are rapidly becoming the norm, driven by tools enabling "spec-to-code" pipelines, agentic execution, and autonomous orchestration. This evolution shifts the bottleneck from writing code to verifying intent, provenance, and security implications. AI-powered IDEs, task-oriented agents, and AI code generators now compose entire services, infrastructure, and test suites, accelerating delivery but also introducing more complexity and risk.

Enterprises must retrofit SDLC controls to accommodate AI-generated artifacts and ensure reproducible builds. Traditional governance models are struggling to keep pace, creating a widening gap between security readiness and productivity. Emerging best practices include policy-as-code, human review for AI-generated code, and AI-aware testing frameworks to validate logic and compliance.

The software supply chain now includes AI-specific attack surfaces for prompt injection, data poisoning, and tool misuse. AI-driven supply chain attacks exploit automation at scale, enabling adversaries to compromise dependencies, CI/CD pipelines, and agentic workflows at unprecedented speed. To mitigate risk, organizations must address technical and cultural challenges including skill atrophy, governance lag, and testing gaps, while adopting SBOMs, continuous monitoring, and zero-trust architecture.

Best practices for secure vibe coding

Vibe coding demands a higher level of application security to ensure safety and compliance. As organizations embrace AI-driven development workflows, mitigating risks and maintaining secure coding standards requires a deliberate, structured approach.

Key practices

Gate AI-generated code with robust security checks

AI-generated code should never bypass established security processes. Incorporate multiple layers of validation, including

·       Human code review to confirm logic and compliance

·       Static and dynamic analysis for early vulnerability detection

·       Software composition analysis to manage open source dependencies

·       Secrets scanning to prevent credential leaks

·       Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) checks to secure cloud configurations

Implement input/output controls

Reduce prompt misuse and unintended actions by

·       Enforcing prompt hygiene

·       Validating outputs against security policies

·       Configuring guardrails to restrict risky operations (e.g., unsafe file handling, direct system calls)

Train teams for safe AI tool usage

Empower developers and vibe coders through

·       Security awareness programs tailored for AI-assisted workflows

·       Proficiency training on AI limitations and associated risks

·       Incident response readiness for vulnerabilities introduced by AI-generated code

Embracing secure creativity

Vibe coders should validate outputs and collaborate closely with security teams. And developers and security professionals should

·       Integrate security practices early in their SDLC

·       Continuously monitor AI-generated code in production

·       Enforce clear policies through CI/CD pipelines

Together, these measures ensure that vibe coding aligns with organizational security standards and emerging best practices, allowing creativity to thrive without compromising safety or compliance.

Conclusion

Vibe coding is transforming the software development landscape by accelerating innovation, but it is also introducing new complexities and risks. As AI tools become deeply integrated in development workflows, software engineers and AppSec professionals must adapt their roles and practices to address these challenges. This requires a cultural shift that balances creativity with engineering discipline and speed with accountability.

Organizations should treat AI-generated code as part of the security perimeter and apply rigorous validation, governance, and supply chain controls. By embedding these safeguards and fostering responsible AI adoption, organizations can unlock the benefits of vibe coding while preserving software integrity, resilience, and trust.

Ready to enhance your application security posture in the era of vibe coding? Request a demo to discover how our solutions can help you navigate the challenges and opportunities of AI-assisted development.

Learn More